The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns confirmed our theory that a lot of people are turned off by political humor.
“I started reading this blog a few months ago. I thought it was funny at first, but I lost interest when I realized almost every post was political. The first ones I read where not like that. It was like a red flag for me. I kept reading for another couple of weeks before I finally gave up.”
CONTENT – 3.9
“Hey! She’s ranting! And it’s craaaaaaaaaazy! Uh … not so much.”
“I just don't get conservative humor. I do have to give her points for posting on a regular basis and quite frequently.”
“Meh.”
“Gotta love a hot conservative chicks. Yowza!”
“Not funny.”
“I don’t get the PERV thing. I assume she’s trying to be ironic, but it’s mainly not funny.”
“I don’t like political blogs.”
DESIGN – 4.1
“I like the color scheme, but the side bars are chaotic and riddled with ads. It takes away from the content.”
“Again, meh.”
“Cluttered. Too many blogs on the blogroll. I'm all for supporting fellow bloggers, but gosh, organize it somehow. It’s too long.”
“The design itself is not too bad, but I wonder if there is any way she could squeeze any more ads in there.”
QUALITY OF WRITING/GRAMMAR – 5.1
“Her posts are short and not really very funny or interesting.”
“She’s a decent enough writer.”
“I don’t care for the content, but the writing is better than average.”
“She writes like a teenager in a chat room.”
INTANGIBLES – 2.6
“Wish lists, ads, begging, long posts that you have to click through to finish reading, surprising lack of a profile … need I go on? I think 5 is a generous number for this category. At least there are no pop ups.”
“I think this chick likes her name since it's referenced three times at the top of the blog (including the address), but that's just a wild guess.”
“None to speak of.”
“Jesus, what a fucking nightmare! I hope she makes enough money from all her ads to retire.”
FREQUENCY – 10
“Samantha Burns posts several times a day.”
WOULD YOU READ THIS BLOG REGULARLY – 8% Yes
“No way.”
“Sure”
“No.”
“Maybe”
“No.”
OVERALL – 49.0
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns obviously has a pretty good following. However, most of our reviewers are not part of the fan club.
“I didn't find this blog funny or enjoyable. However, I can't put my finger on the ‘problem,’ so I should probably just shut up about it.”
“I started reading this blog a few months ago. I thought it was funny at first, but I lost interest when I realized almost every post was political. The first ones I read where not like that. It was like a red flag for me. I kept reading for another couple of weeks before I finally gave up.”
CONTENT – 3.9
“Hey! She’s ranting! And it’s craaaaaaaaaazy! Uh … not so much.”
“I just don't get conservative humor. I do have to give her points for posting on a regular basis and quite frequently.”
“Meh.”
“Gotta love a hot conservative chicks. Yowza!”
“Not funny.”
“I don’t get the PERV thing. I assume she’s trying to be ironic, but it’s mainly not funny.”
“I don’t like political blogs.”
DESIGN – 4.1
“I like the color scheme, but the side bars are chaotic and riddled with ads. It takes away from the content.”
“Again, meh.”
“Cluttered. Too many blogs on the blogroll. I'm all for supporting fellow bloggers, but gosh, organize it somehow. It’s too long.”
“The design itself is not too bad, but I wonder if there is any way she could squeeze any more ads in there.”
QUALITY OF WRITING/GRAMMAR – 5.1
“Her posts are short and not really very funny or interesting.”
“She’s a decent enough writer.”
“I don’t care for the content, but the writing is better than average.”
“She writes like a teenager in a chat room.”
INTANGIBLES – 2.6
“Wish lists, ads, begging, long posts that you have to click through to finish reading, surprising lack of a profile … need I go on? I think 5 is a generous number for this category. At least there are no pop ups.”
“I think this chick likes her name since it's referenced three times at the top of the blog (including the address), but that's just a wild guess.”
“None to speak of.”
“Jesus, what a fucking nightmare! I hope she makes enough money from all her ads to retire.”
FREQUENCY – 10
“Samantha Burns posts several times a day.”
WOULD YOU READ THIS BLOG REGULARLY – 8% Yes
“No way.”
“Sure”
“No.”
“Maybe”
“No.”
OVERALL – 49.0
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns obviously has a pretty good following. However, most of our reviewers are not part of the fan club.
“I didn't find this blog funny or enjoyable. However, I can't put my finger on the ‘problem,’ so I should probably just shut up about it.”
posted by BlogLaughs at
Friday, August 18, 2006
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home