Gallery of the Absurd
Gallery of the Absurd is the home of Fourteen, a talented artist who “illustrates the sordid world of gossip and slander while trying to keep a straight face.”
Mixed reviews kept Gallery of the Absurd from scoring too high or low, but it did find a spot on our Top-50 list.
CONTENT – 6.1
“Fourteen is quite a talented artist, but I don’t know how funny this is. Amusing, maybe.”
“Definitely bizarre. Good call on the Janet Jackson photo, though.”
“I didn't find it funny or even interesting or read-worthy.”
“Regular, timely posts.”
“Don't we rate humor blogs? I didn't laugh.”
DESIGN – 6.5
“Looks like a standard, three-column TypePad template.”
“Google ads-ick. Boring color scheme.”
“A little better than a standard template.”
QUALITY OF WRITING/GRAMMAR – 6.6
“Regular, timely posts; good use of grammar, spelling, punctuation and capitalization.”
“I don't see anything glaring.”
“The writing is OK, but the artwork is the star. She misspells a few words here and there but nothing bad.”
INTANGIBLES – 7.9
“I enjoy the original artwork on this blog. Therein is the true creativity of this particular blog. This would have garnered a ‘10’ if it were not for the ads in the side panel.”
“I think the whole blog is a peeve.”
“The ads on the side panel suck, but posting original artwork has got to be worth a few extra points somewhere.”
“I like anyone who has an ‘about’ page.”
FREQUENCY – 5.0
“Fourteen posts about two or three original pieces a week, from what we could tell.”
WOULD YOU READ THIS BLOG REGULARLY – 36% Yes
“Sure.”
“No.”
“Perhaps. I added it to my faves. Let's wait and see.”
“Not a chance.”
OVERALL – 69.3
Mixed reviews kept Gallery of the Absurd from scoring too high or low, but it did find a spot on our Top-50 list.
CONTENT – 6.1
“Fourteen is quite a talented artist, but I don’t know how funny this is. Amusing, maybe.”
“Definitely bizarre. Good call on the Janet Jackson photo, though.”
“I didn't find it funny or even interesting or read-worthy.”
“Regular, timely posts.”
“Don't we rate humor blogs? I didn't laugh.”
DESIGN – 6.5
“Looks like a standard, three-column TypePad template.”
“Google ads-ick. Boring color scheme.”
“A little better than a standard template.”
QUALITY OF WRITING/GRAMMAR – 6.6
“Regular, timely posts; good use of grammar, spelling, punctuation and capitalization.”
“I don't see anything glaring.”
“The writing is OK, but the artwork is the star. She misspells a few words here and there but nothing bad.”
INTANGIBLES – 7.9
“I enjoy the original artwork on this blog. Therein is the true creativity of this particular blog. This would have garnered a ‘10’ if it were not for the ads in the side panel.”
“I think the whole blog is a peeve.”
“The ads on the side panel suck, but posting original artwork has got to be worth a few extra points somewhere.”
“I like anyone who has an ‘about’ page.”
FREQUENCY – 5.0
“Fourteen posts about two or three original pieces a week, from what we could tell.”
WOULD YOU READ THIS BLOG REGULARLY – 36% Yes
“Sure.”
“No.”
“Perhaps. I added it to my faves. Let's wait and see.”
“Not a chance.”
OVERALL – 69.3
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home